The defendant in the case of illegal enrichment, judge of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv, Andriy Anokhin, remains in office and continues to "trade cases."
Recall that judge Andriy Anokhin has long been in the sights of investigative journalists due to accusations of systemic corruption. In particular, the KYIV OPERATEV reported that Andriy Anokhin released a serial thief - a thief of luxury cars - for a bribe .
According to People's Deputy Oleksandr Dubinsky, the amount of bribe that Judge Andriy Anokhin usually takes for the necessary decision in a case starts at 30 thousand US dollars.
PHOTO: Screenshot of Oleksandr Dubinsky's TG channel
previously written , drawing attention to the fact that the judge's standard of living does not correspond to the official declaration, and the property acquired in an incomprehensible way is registered in the name of relatives.
We remind you that after a series of publications in the media, law enforcement agencies became interested in the undeclared assets of judge Andriy Anokhin.
Thus, in the summer of 2025, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office filed a lawsuit against judges Andriy Anokhin and his wife Lesya Budzan to declare assets worth over 7 million hryvnias unfounded and recover them as state revenue.
In particular, the prosecutor's office demands the confiscation of part of the apartment and two parking spaces (garages) in the elite Kyiv residential complex, which are used by the judges.
This is an apartment with an area of 104 sq.m., which is reflected in the property declarations of the judges. 50% is registered to Judge Lesya Budzan, and the remaining 50% to Serhiy Babushkin, who is the brother of Budzan's husband, Judge Andriy Anokhin. The judge's brother is only the nominal owner of one of the parking spaces and a share of the apartment, since he does not use them and, given his legal income, was unable to purchase them.
In addition, the value of the purchased property in the purchase and sale agreements is considered significantly understated, and the real price is twice as high. The value of the share of the apartment in declaration as of the date of acquisition in October 2022 is indicated as UAH 1.64 million. But the prosecutor's office claims that the share of the apartment cost more than UAH 6 million.
