Millions on deposit: Defense contract scheme exposed in the Ministry of Defense

A large-scale corruption scheme in the field of defense procurement has been exposed in Ukraine, involving high-ranking officials of the Ministry of Defense and representatives of private business. The defendants in the case are the acting director of the Ministry of Defense Procurement Department, Colonel Oleksandr Osadchy, director of the Ministry of Defense Legal Support Department, Oleksiy Kaminetsky, and the owner of PrJSC “NPO “Praktyka” Oleg Vysotsky.

The mechanism was built so that public funds intended for the needs of the army would bring profit to private individuals.

On March 30, 2022, PrJSC "NVO "Praktika" received an advance payment of UAH 124.1 million under a defense contract signed just two days before. On the same day, the company placed over UAH 113 million on deposit with Ukreximbank, earning over UAH 3 million in passive income.

In fact, the budget money allocated for the purchase of equipment was used as a financial instrument for generating profit unrelated to the fulfillment of the state order.

Despite the obvious signs of illicit enrichment, the Ministry of Defense did not initiate any lawsuits or claims against the supplier. Moreover, in April 2023, an additional agreement was concluded, which reduced the price of the equipment unit by the amount earned from the deposit. This created the appearance of “balancing”, but in fact legalized the illicit profit and hid the initial overestimation of the contract value.

Praktika continued to win government tenders. The technical requirements of the tenders were often written in such a way as to eliminate competitors and give an advantage to a particular supplier. This allowed the company to set inflated prices.

The money obtained as a result of these schemes was legalized through a wide network of accounts in dozens of banks. The funds were transferred to fictitious enterprises, converted into cash and taken abroad. According to sources, the management of banking institutions deliberately “turned a blind eye” to transactions with obvious signs of laundering.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Construction of the Shostka shelter: the contractor offered sand at twice the market price

Construction of a shelter for the Shostka Vocational and Technical Education Center again...

VAKS confiscated the property of the head of the village council in the Rivne region: house, land, boat

On November 26, the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court ruled to recover...

No precipitation in Ukraine today, but with strong southerly winds

On November 26, the weather in Ukraine will be determined by a warm air mass...

Lack of sleep doubles the risk of serious illness: new British study sounds the alarm

Despite widespread awareness of the importance of quality rest, most adults...

Orbital company Standard One is suing Kyiv City Council for half a hectare of land in Obolon

One of the most high-profile land conflicts of the year is underway in Kyiv...

Deputy Head of Transcarpathian OVA Biletsky is accused of schemes with forests, tenders and covering up smuggling

The Transcarpathian region has found itself at the center of a number of high-profile corruption scandals,...

Military expert Hetman called for involving young people from the age of 18 to create a reserve of Ukraine

Ukraine must prepare a powerful mobilization reserve involving young men...

Belgrade police questioned singer Sergey Babkin over random finds in luggage

Serbian law enforcement officers detained Ukrainian singer Serhiy... at Belgrade airport