Poroshenko lost the trial against Zelensky

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of former President and People's Deputy from the "European Solidarity" Petro Poroshenko against the current President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky.

Since the end of last year, Poroshenko has been trying to repeal Presidential Decree No. 27 of January 23, 2023, “On Some Issues Concerning Crossing the State Border of Ukraine under Martial Law.” This document put into effect a decision of the National Security and Defense Council, according to which the Cabinet of Ministers was to amend the rules for crossing the state border for civil servants, people's deputies, judges, and prosecutors, allowing travel only on official business trips.

Poroshenko believes that the decree violated his constitutional right to freely leave the territory of Ukraine. However, on December 1, 2023, border guards did not allow him to travel to Poland and the United States to participate in the Summit of the International Democratic Union. Andriy Demchenko, a spokesman for the State Border Service of Ukraine (SBSU), reported that the travel ban was due to the fact that the Verkhovna Rada canceled the deputy's trip.

In his lawsuit, Poroshenko noted that the border guards were guided by new changes that came into effect after the issuance of the controversial presidential decree.

The Supreme Court initially returned Poroshenko's lawsuit because he missed the deadline to appeal Zelensky's decree. According to the law, the deadline for appeal is six months from the date of adoption of the document, which expired on July 25, 2023.

Disagreeing with this decision, Poroshenko appealed it to the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. However, the court concluded that the decree of January 23, 2023 is an act of individual action that does not affect the rights of the plaintiff.

"The plaintiff's arguments that although the decree was not adopted directly regarding Petro Poroshenko, it nevertheless concerns his rights, freedoms, as well as the legally established guarantees for the activities of people's deputies of Ukraine, are unfounded," the court ruling states.

The court also emphasized that the incident with the travel ban on Poroshenko in December 2023 is not the subject of this dispute. The Grand Chamber's ruling entered into force on October 3 and is not subject to appeal.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Russians attacked a passenger train in Mykolaiv with a "shaheed"

Russian troops attacked Mykolaiv with a Shahed attack drone. Under...

A symbol of a home holiday: where the popular waffle cake came from

A simple, affordable and familiar from childhood waffle cake without...

Masha Efrosinina showed off her figure in a swimsuit and revealed the principles of her diet

Ukrainian TV presenter Masha Efrosinina once again attracted the attention of her followers with a candid...

New scientific discovery explains why men live shorter lives than women

Researchers from the University of Virginia analyzed data from over 200...

Children's Hospital Ophthalmologist Fined for Bribe Extortion

Khmelnytskyi City District Court found ophthalmologist Oleksandr Tarambula guilty of...

Filatov stated about the risk of a Russian offensive on the Dnieper

Dnipro Mayor Borys Filatov said that there is a risk of a possible...

Rivne OVA granted the company booking status despite loss-making

In December 2025, the Rivne Regional Military Administration provided...

The case of seizure of an oil product pipeline was transferred to court: Medvedchuk appears in it

The Prosecutor General's Office has submitted an indictment to the court regarding...