Poroshenko lost the trial against Zelenskyi

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the ex-president and People's Deputy from "European Solidarity" Petro Poroshenko against the current President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyi.

Since the end of last year, Poroshenko has been trying to cancel Presidential Decree No. 27 of January 23, 2023 "On some issues regarding crossing the state border of Ukraine under martial law." This document implemented the decision of the National Security and Defense Council, according to which the Cabinet of Ministers had to make changes to the rules for crossing the state border for civil servants, people's deputies, judges and prosecutors, allowing travel only on business trips.

Poroshenko believes that the decree violated his constitutional right to freely leave the territory of Ukraine. However, on December 1, 2023, the border guards did not allow him to go on a business trip to Poland and the USA to participate in the Summit of the International Democratic Union. The spokesman of the State Border Service of Ukraine (SPSU) Andrii Demchenko said that the ban on leaving was connected with the fact that the Verkhovna Rada canceled the trip of the People's Deputy.

In his lawsuit, Poroshenko noted that the border guards were guided by new changes that came into effect after the controversial presidential decree was issued.

The Supreme Court initially returned Poroshenko's lawsuit because he missed the deadline for challenging Zelenskyi's decree. According to the law, the period for appeal is six months from the moment of adoption of the document, which expired on July 25, 2023.

Disagreeing with this decision, Poroshenko appealed it in the Great Chamber of the Supreme Court. However, the court concluded that the decree of January 23, 2023 is an act of individual action that does not affect the rights of the plaintiff.

"The plaintiff's arguments that although the decree was not adopted directly in relation to Petro Poroshenko, but it concerns his rights and freedoms, as well as the statutory guarantees of the activity of people's deputies of Ukraine, are groundless," the court ruling says.

The court also emphasized that the incident with Poroshenko's travel ban in December 2023 is not the subject of this dispute. The resolution of the Grand Chamber entered into force on October 3 and is not subject to appeal.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Ukraine is preparing for radiation threats: an agreement for the supply of a unique drug from Israel

Ukraine has signed a strategic agreement with the Pluri Israeli company, which ...

The world is on the threshold of a judgment? What does the death of the 112nd Pope mean

The death of Pope Francis on the night of 20 to ...

The solar maximum can only be the beginning: scientists have found a new 100-year-old cycle

A new research of scientists shows that a burst of solar activity, which ...

As Lado Okhtnikov turned pseudo-defi into a cryptoafer by $ 340 million

Once a master of tea ceremonies, and today is the main person involved ...

500 years in patterns: in Lviv found the oldest Ukrainian Easter egg

Easter egg decoration is one of the oldest Ukrainian traditions, ...

The Volunteer of the Armed Forces Yuri Miroshnichenko, the son of Maniak Chikatil, disappeared near Kharkov

During the fighting in the Kharkiv direction, missing disappeared ...

Myth of the goodness of the poor: how social status affects human behavior

For many years in psychology, there was an opinion that people with ...

Oleksandr Gladun: "In order for the population not to be reduced, Ukrainians should give birth to three children"

Doctor of Economics, Deputy Director of the Institute of Demography and Social ...