The appointment of Timur Tkachenko as the head of the Kyiv City Military Administration (KMVA) drew attention not only to his professional qualities, but also to the financial situation of the family. Published data on the fortunes of his wife Hanna Tkachenko aroused public interest, especially in the conditions of war and Ukraine's constant fight against corruption.
Hanna Tkachenko demonstrates a stable income from entrepreneurial activities and profitable transactions with movable property. In 2023, she earned UAH 2.45 million. Part of these funds was used to purchase a 2022 BMW X3 car worth UAH 1.6 million. In past years, the family has also added a Porsche Macan (2018), an Audi Q5 (2012) and a Volkswagen Golf (2017) to the fleet.
Currently, she owns a country house with an area of 151.3 square meters. m near Kyiv, as well as three land plots with a total area of 3.51 hectares in the Brovar district.
Family ties give even more interest in the fortunes of the Tkachenko family. Hanna Tkachenko is the sister of the wife of Semen Krivonos, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU). Accordingly, Timur Tkachenko is the country's main anti-corruption officer. This fact is an additional question about the negative impact on the transparency of the family's activities in the context of their lifestyle.
The financial data of Timur Tkachenko himself are much more modest. Despite the fact that he is officially a millionaire (in particular, due to ready-made savings in the amount of 700 thousand UAH and $10 thousand), there is no real or movable property of his own in the declarations. Instead, he uses other people's cars, including a Lexus LS 460 (2008) and a Toyota Rav4 (2021).
Tkachenko's salary in 2023 was 692,000. hryvnias, which corresponds to his official duties, but checks whether the level of income corresponds to the lifestyle of his family.
The published data raise questions about the family's sources of income, their compliance with declared wealth, and the role of family ties in creating financial stability.
Given the importance of fighting corruption in wartime, this situation needs transparent explanations and appropriate checks. Society expects clear answers to questions about the origin of funds that can lead such a lifestyle, and the readiness of high-ranking officials for complete openness.
In the conditions of military challenges and constant monitoring of international partners in compliance with transparency standards, Ukraine must set an example of honesty and justice in the use of public resources and functions.
