Antitrust scheme: how Vorobey, Kyrylenko and Muzychenko legalized the seizure of assets of UPG and the Privat Group

At the center of a large-scale criminal case are officials of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine, high-ranking officials and Belarusian businessman Mykola Vorobey, the actual owner of the UPG gas station network. Case No. 72024142500000017 is being investigated by the Territorial Department of the Bureau of Economic Security in Lviv region. It concerns a systemic scheme of tax evasion, seizure of assets and legalization of criminal funds.

According to the investigation, Mykola Vorobey, using the private enterprise "UKRPALETSYSTEM" (EDRPOU code 32285225) controlled by him, created an organized criminal group together with the Chairman of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Pavlo Kyrylenko and his first deputy Oleksandr Muzychenko. They are suspected of having facilitated the illegal acquisition of control over the assets of the Privat Group and of evading taxes, acting in the interests of the aggressor state.

The key element of this scheme is the permits for the concentration of business entities, which were granted by the Antimonopoly Committee. It was these permits that legalized the process of seizing assets and created the appearance of legality of the operations. However, as investigators claim, the decisions of the Antimonopoly Committee violated the norms of national legislation and indicate a direct collusion of officials with business structures close to Belarusian capital.

The scheme, according to the investigation, had a clearly structured hierarchy and mechanisms. The controlled companies were used for fictitious activities, falsification of data about owners, financial flows and the real origin of funds. There was also a question of "kickbacks" for assistance in decision-making and large-scale legalization of illegal income.

The investigation is currently ongoing, examining the full chain of companies and individuals involved in the scheme. Particular attention is being paid to examining financial flows, asset transfer mechanisms and funding sources, as well as connections between government officials and foreign business entities.

This case could become one of the most high-profile economic crimes in the history of Ukraine. But whether the investigation will lead to convictions - only time and political will will tell.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Ambassadorial candidate with a corruption trail: what is Stefanishyna hiding?

Olga Stefanishyna, who was previously accused in a corruption case,...

Earth is accelerating: why July 10, 2025, became the shortest day in history

On July 10, 2025, the Earth set a new record —...

The court ruled the creation of a military cemetery in the Markhaliv Forest illegal.

On August 5, 2025, the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal ruled...

In Chernivtsi, teenagers beat a peer at a skate park

A video in which a teenager...

Why does your smartphone drain at night, even when you're not using it?

Modern smartphones have one common problem: the battery drains...

Ukrainians sharply reduced the purchase of cash currency: why did this happen and what will happen next

In the second quarter of 2025, Ukrainians significantly reduced demand...

Parimatch is back as Stawki — an offshore casino has been launched in Ukraine

Amid the high-profile sanctions against Parimatch imposed...

Gaidai in the drone case: an executor or a cover for the generals?

The detention of Serhiy Gaidai, former head of the Luhansk OVA, by NABU detectives...