The ex-head of KP "Miskyi Magazin" Aman Molamov, despite the high-profile criminal case of NABU, continues to crush the work of street fairs in Kyiv. We are talking about a turnover of half a billion hryvnias per month.
Molamov Aman Mansurovych Mansur Ogly first became known to the general public after the high-profile case of NABU, as a co-participant in the organization of a corruption scheme for receiving bribes for assistance in the placement of mobile trading points - the so-called "kupavas". According to the investigation, the suspects received a bribe of 1 million 390 thousand hryvnias in two parts, after which they were detained.
The organizer of the scheme was Vladyslav Trubitsyn, a KSDA deputy from the Servant of the People faction, who managed to cross the state border and avoid punishment, but the main executor of the scheme was Aman Molamov, who remains in Ukraine and through his people in the KSDA continues to tax farmers and small private enterprises engaged in trade at city fairs.
To understand the size of the corruption flows that pass through Aman Molamov, it is enough to consider some statistical data. Yes, food and agricultural fairs in the capital are held every day, according to the approved schedule , which can be found on the KMDA website.
Statistics show that more than 1 million Kyivans visit such fairs per month with an average check of 500 hryvnias, according to the most modest estimates, which is 0.5 billion hryvnias in turnover. As you can see, quite a tasty piece.
Aman Molamov controls these flows through his brothers, who currently work in the KMDA, and his people also set up tents at fairs. According to our sources, every merchant must pay Molamov "tribute" to the people for the opportunity to trade.
This approach nullifies the very idea of creating agricultural fairs where Kyiv residents were supposed to get direct access to cheap and high-quality products from farms: thanks to the intervention of Aman Molamov, they become not so cheap, because each trade tent is covered with a "tribute", which in turn is reflected on product prices.
Since Aman Molamov is actually engaged in racketeering in relation to traders, the implementation of this scheme is impossible without the participation of law enforcement officers at the district level. According to our sources, for the smooth operation of the scheme, Molamov is regularly "introduced" by police officers at the level of heads or sub-commissions of the ROVD.
At the same time, Aman Molamov has a "roof" in the SBU, which he had the imprudence to brag about in the circle of acquaintances. According to our sources, Molamov's so-called "roof" in the SBU are low-level managers who are responsible for economic crimes and corruption. Although Aman Molamov never publicly mentioned the names of SBU employees, the scheme really works and helps Molamov stay on the corruption streams and avoid criminal responsibility.
In this context, a natural question arises whether the head of the SBU, Vasyl Malyuk, was informed about the actions of his subordinates, from the crushing of Aman Molamov, who, together with his accomplices, is actually engaged in racketeering.
The second natural question is, how did Aman Molamov manage to avoid criminal responsibility in a rather high-profile case of a million-dollar bribe, where all the dialogues of the accomplices and all their actions were documented in detail? Did Aman Molamov cooperate with NABU as an agent, or are Vasyl Malyuk's subordinates still helping Molamov to avoid responsibility?
We ask you to consider this journalistic investigation as an official request to NABU, SBU and SBU in order to verify the facts presented in the article.
