The chairman of the Kharkiv Regional Council Tatiana Yegorova-Lutsenko was again in the center of the journalistic investigation. While the area lives under the threat of shelling, in the declarations of the official - rapid growth of income, expensive jewelry, renting an apartment in Kiev and Porsche, recorded on "familiar".
The StopCor team analyzed its declarations in recent years, and found numerous discrepancies that may indicate the classic scheme of concealment of property through relatives and false persons.
According to official information, in 2024 alone, the income of Yegorova-Lutsenko amounted to more than UAH 1.1 million. This is 37% more than last year. Her ex -husband, Vitaliy Lutsenko, declared more than UAH 3.3 million, which he allegedly received as an entrepreneur. In the amount - over UAH 6.6 million per year.
But the question is not only a salary. The declaration includes two apartments near Kharkiv and Kharkiv itself, a leased apartment in Kiev, two fur coats made of natural fur, jewelry with precious stones, more than 1 million UAH of cash. Plus the Porsche Macan 2021, officially recorded on the citizen of Nadiya Peremok. Who this woman is not explained. Such "optimization" of property has long become a favorite scheme of Ukrainian officials.
The divorce with the man, for whom she came out before the beginning of a political career, was officially registered only in February 2025. It is interesting that the process of divorce was in absentia-Tatiana Yegorova-Lutsenko did not appear in court without giving any explanation. Meanwhile, her husband owns a restaurant in Cannes and, according to unofficial information, housing in Nice. This property is not indicated in the declarations, but the official states: everything is declared - it is simply "former".
Despite the loud explanations, the NAPC continues to be tested for the use of a service car for private trips of a man Yegorova-Lutsenko. He allegedly went with children, but could it be included in the official delegation of Kharkiv region? Moreover, according to the sources in the French business circles, the invitation for Lutsenko could be lobbyed through personal connections.
Egorova-Lutsenko herself has traditionally denied all the accusations. But coincidence and income growth over the last year is too much. Why did the volumes of declared property grow sharply after divorce? How did the declaration appear jewelry and cash that were not before? And why does the Porsche go, not his formal owner?
All these are issues that not only journalists but also anti -corruption bodies should be interested. And it seems that the NACC check is just the beginning.
