Millions on deposit: Defense contract scheme exposed in the Ministry of Defense

A large-scale corruption scheme in the field of defense procurement has been exposed in Ukraine, involving high-ranking officials of the Ministry of Defense and representatives of private business. The defendants in the case are the acting director of the Ministry of Defense Procurement Department, Colonel Oleksandr Osadchy, director of the Ministry of Defense Legal Support Department, Oleksiy Kaminetsky, and the owner of PrJSC “NPO “Praktyka” Oleg Vysotsky.

The mechanism was built so that public funds intended for the needs of the army would bring profit to private individuals.

On March 30, 2022, PrJSC "NVO "Praktika" received an advance payment of UAH 124.1 million under a defense contract signed just two days before. On the same day, the company placed over UAH 113 million on deposit with Ukreximbank, earning over UAH 3 million in passive income.

In fact, the budget money allocated for the purchase of equipment was used as a financial instrument for generating profit unrelated to the fulfillment of the state order.

Despite the obvious signs of illicit enrichment, the Ministry of Defense did not initiate any lawsuits or claims against the supplier. Moreover, in April 2023, an additional agreement was concluded, which reduced the price of the equipment unit by the amount earned from the deposit. This created the appearance of “balancing”, but in fact legalized the illicit profit and hid the initial overestimation of the contract value.

Praktika continued to win government tenders. The technical requirements of the tenders were often written in such a way as to eliminate competitors and give an advantage to a particular supplier. This allowed the company to set inflated prices.

The money obtained as a result of these schemes was legalized through a wide network of accounts in dozens of banks. The funds were transferred to fictitious enterprises, converted into cash and taken abroad. According to sources, the management of banking institutions deliberately “turned a blind eye” to transactions with obvious signs of laundering.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Negotiations between Ukraine and Russia may be postponed due to the activation of the “Iranian case.” Sources

According to our sources, the likelihood of Ukraine resuming negotiations with...

Anxiety is exacerbated in winter by light, sleep, and isolation

Winter can have a subtle effect on a person's emotional state. Short...

Dmytro Firtash is trying to regain control over Lvivgaz and Zakarpatgaz through VAKS

Dmytro Firtash launched a large-scale legal campaign to restore...

In the Kyiv region, military personnel will be tried for stealing diesel from the warehouses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Prosecutors of the Specialized Prosecutor's Office for Defense of the Central Region sent...

Negotiating groups are leveling their positions: Zelenskyy and Putin's meeting could take place in three weeks

In the negotiation process to end the war, work has intensified on...

A company with zero turnover received over 1.5 billion for power system equipment

Amid constant attacks on the Ukrainian power system, the purchase of equipment...

The fifth year of the war: what happened to the image of Zelensky and Putin

After 1,460 days of full-scale war, the central figures of the conflict remain...

What holidays are celebrated on February 24 in Ukraine and the world?

February 24th will forever go down in Ukrainian history as the day...