NABU exposed a lawyer Dmitry Borzikh in large -scale rainfall closed information for influential customers

Dmitry Borzikh, former Deputy Chief Military Prosecutor Anatoly Matios, was again in the center of the anti -corruption scandal. This time - as a person involved in the criminal proceedings of NABU and SAP. He was informed of suspicion of unauthorized access to the closed part of the Unified Register of Pre -trial Investigations (ERDR), in particular to the decisions of the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court (BCS).

According to the investigation, Borzykh, together with two other lawyers - one of whom was the actual head of the lawyer association - organized a systematic leakage of closed information. To do this, a special script was developed to automatically collect new solutions and data from the registry every 12 hours. A total of almost 40,000 searches were made and more than 7.5 thousand court decisions were revised.

This information was transmitted by the lawyers to their clients-among them, according to journalists, were the persons involved in high-profile affairs: Igor Kolomoisky, Boris Kaufman, Alexander Granovsky, Grigory Kozlovsky and Bankir Kirill Shevchenko.

Borzikh is currently engaged in lawyer's practice, and therefore the consent of lawyer's self -government is required for his detention.

It is worth noting that the name of Dmitry Borzikh has already appeared in investigations of investigative journalists. In 2018, Bihus.info published a material that found out that the then deputy military prosecutor lived in a luxurious house in the village of Lisniki near Kiev (390 sq.m), traveled to Toyota Camry, and his probable cohabitant - at Range Range Rover Evover Evover Evover. However, in the Borzi declaration he did not specify the lease, no relatives or family members, and did not declare his partner's fortune.

The NABU opened criminal proceedings under articles on false declaration (366-1) and illegal enrichment (368-2). The case was then closed and then re -opened - however, she never reached the indictment.

New suspicions seem to have more serious consequences-it is not only a violation of ethical standards, but also about a possible impact on investigating cases against top figures of Ukrainian politics and business.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Six cases when a student can mobilize

Despite the fact that most full -time students have ...

The Russian Federation can try to surround Kharkiv

The Russian command activates fighting in several directions at the same time, ...

The son of a scandalous official MSEC bought an entertainment center from a patient's patient's patient

The next scandal around a possible corruption scheme is unfolding in Khmelnitsky ...

Which of the Ukrainian officials holds millions in crypt

Cryptocurrency is a new cash of Ukrainian powerful. According to the results of the declaration ...

KMVA blames the city authorities of building Trukhanov island

The new head of the Kyiv City Military Administration Timur Tkachenko declared ...

NAPC found a violation in the Explode Declaration

NAPC found in the Declaration of the exhibition of Ukraine in Spain Anatoly ...

Ukrainian drones have turned into a cybercribe

Ukrainian drones are not only impressive in the battlefield ...

Traditions, prayers and signs on April 3: what cannot be done today

On Wednesday, April 3, 2025, the Orthodox Church of Ukraine ...