New attempts by companies connected to the Surkis family to change judges in the case with PrivatBank

On Wednesday, March 27, the Supreme Court plans to consider the cassation appeals of the Cabinet of Ministers and PrivatBank in case No. 757/7499/17. This case concerns a lawsuit filed by six non-resident companies related to the Surkis family against the state-owned PrivatBank, the Ministry of Finance and the Government, with the demand to collect almost $350 million from PrivatBank.

The bank's press service reports that the hearing of this case was supposed to take place on March 20, but was postponed due to an appeal by a representative of non-resident companies to two of the five judges of the panel. After the new appointment of the case for consideration by two other judges, Vadym Ignatenko and Alla Oliynyk, a new date of the court session was set - March 27. It is worth noting that Alla Oliynyk is currently at the stage of selection to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.

However, opponents of the bank once again challenged the newly appointed judges, citing their decisions in favor of PrivatBank in previous cases. The bank's lawyers emphasize that such an appeal is selective, since there are other judges in the panel who made decisions in favor of the bank, but they were not appealed.

This case, known as the Surkis offshore case, has been pending since 2017 and has been before the Supreme Court since 2020. The lawyers of "PrivatBank" emphasize holding a meeting with the participation of all parties in order to prove the groundlessness of the contested decision. However, the court did not grant their requests.

"PrivatBank" continues the fight for justice and the rule of law, stressing that no one in Ukraine is above the law.

We will remind that during the nationalization of "PrivatBank" at the end of 2016, funds placed by non-resident companies related to the bank's former owners were included in the bail-in procedure, since the National Bank of Ukraine recognized the Surkis family as related to "PrivatBank" .

In addition to the court proceedings in Ukraine, non-resident companies related to the Surkis family are also trying to obtain a decision in a court in Cyprus.

Last year, the Central Commercial Court of Appeal canceled the decision to declare Montana-Estate LLC, formerly known as "Privatofis", as bankrupt.

In addition, "PrivatBank" is trying to condemn 245 gas stations used by companies controlled by Igor Kolomoiskyi and his entourage.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

“I am not a fugitive”: Vinnik's singer stated that he has been living in Germany for 25 years

Oleg Vinnik - as the former one, of which already ...

The KSCA Registrar illegally reprinted the land in the center of Kiev: losses over 14 million

Law enforcement officers exposed the next scheme of illegal re -registration of communal land in ...

The firm with criminal history builds a veterans hospital at EU expense

The project of construction of the corps of the Rivne Regional Hospital of War Veterans, which ...

Up to 10 million particles each year: how microplastic affects health

Eating microscopic plastic particles along with food or drinks ...

The mayor of Pereyaslav did not declare any cash but has a church, a vet clinic and a loan

In 2024, the mayor of Pereyaslav Vyacheslav Saulko declared ...

Dorming on $ 150 million: As Katsubs avoided punishment for schore with Chornomornaftogaz

The purchase of drilling installations for Chornomornaftogaz in 2011–2013 became ...

The daughter of singer Oli Polyakova became a wife: what is known about the wedding

July 17, the eldest daughter of Ukrainian singer Oli Polyakova —...

KSCA Ex head from Yanukovych's surroundings arrested abroad

Former MP and KSCA Head Vladimir Makeenko lost ...