New attempts by companies connected to the Surkis family to change judges in the case with PrivatBank

On Wednesday, March 27, the Supreme Court plans to consider the cassation appeals of the Cabinet of Ministers and PrivatBank in case No. 757/7499/17. This case concerns a lawsuit filed by six non-resident companies related to the Surkis family against the state-owned PrivatBank, the Ministry of Finance and the Government, with the demand to collect almost $350 million from PrivatBank.

The bank's press service reports that the hearing of this case was supposed to take place on March 20, but was postponed due to an appeal by a representative of non-resident companies to two of the five judges of the panel. After the new appointment of the case for consideration by two other judges, Vadym Ignatenko and Alla Oliynyk, a new date of the court session was set - March 27. It is worth noting that Alla Oliynyk is currently at the stage of selection to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.

However, opponents of the bank once again challenged the newly appointed judges, citing their decisions in favor of PrivatBank in previous cases. The bank's lawyers emphasize that such an appeal is selective, since there are other judges in the panel who made decisions in favor of the bank, but they were not appealed.

This case, known as the Surkis offshore case, has been pending since 2017 and has been before the Supreme Court since 2020. The lawyers of "PrivatBank" emphasize holding a meeting with the participation of all parties in order to prove the groundlessness of the contested decision. However, the court did not grant their requests.

"PrivatBank" continues the fight for justice and the rule of law, stressing that no one in Ukraine is above the law.

We will remind that during the nationalization of "PrivatBank" at the end of 2016, funds placed by non-resident companies related to the bank's former owners were included in the bail-in procedure, since the National Bank of Ukraine recognized the Surkis family as related to "PrivatBank" .

In addition to the court proceedings in Ukraine, non-resident companies related to the Surkis family are also trying to obtain a decision in a court in Cyprus.

Last year, the Central Commercial Court of Appeal canceled the decision to declare Montana-Estate LLC, formerly known as "Privatofis", as bankrupt.

In addition, "PrivatBank" is trying to condemn 245 gas stations used by companies controlled by Igor Kolomoiskyi and his entourage.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Tusk: “Trump’s optimism about Ukraine means a reduction in the US role in the war”

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that unexpectedly pro-Ukrainian words...

Former MP from Lviv region suspected of false declaration of over UAH 4.7 million

In the Lviv region, a former city council member became a defendant...

Holidays on September 26: signs and prohibitions on this day

September 26 combines several international, church and...

Forecasters told what the weather will be like on September 26 in Ukraine

Cool and dry weather will set in in Ukraine before the weekend....

The Internet is outraged by Vinnyk's new video with a Russian song

Oleg Vinnyk, who previously assured that he would never...

Former head of the DOT Zhumadilov withdrew millions from the budget through a "contract"

While Ukrainians are transferring the last of their money to the needs of the army, in...

Vitamin B3: why is it needed and which foods are the main sources

Vitamin B3, better known as niacin or vitamin PP,...

Restaurant owner in Rivne ordered to pay debt for 15 years of land use

The Rivne Court of Appeal reviewed the case regarding the use of a land plot...