Poroshenko lost the trial against Zelenskyi

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the ex-president and People's Deputy from "European Solidarity" Petro Poroshenko against the current President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyi.

Since the end of last year, Poroshenko has been trying to cancel Presidential Decree No. 27 of January 23, 2023 "On some issues regarding crossing the state border of Ukraine under martial law." This document implemented the decision of the National Security and Defense Council, according to which the Cabinet of Ministers had to make changes to the rules for crossing the state border for civil servants, people's deputies, judges and prosecutors, allowing travel only on business trips.

Poroshenko believes that the decree violated his constitutional right to freely leave the territory of Ukraine. However, on December 1, 2023, the border guards did not allow him to go on a business trip to Poland and the USA to participate in the Summit of the International Democratic Union. The spokesman of the State Border Service of Ukraine (SPSU) Andrii Demchenko said that the ban on leaving was connected with the fact that the Verkhovna Rada canceled the trip of the People's Deputy.

In his lawsuit, Poroshenko noted that the border guards were guided by new changes that came into effect after the controversial presidential decree was issued.

The Supreme Court initially returned Poroshenko's lawsuit because he missed the deadline for challenging Zelenskyi's decree. According to the law, the period for appeal is six months from the moment of adoption of the document, which expired on July 25, 2023.

Disagreeing with this decision, Poroshenko appealed it in the Great Chamber of the Supreme Court. However, the court concluded that the decree of January 23, 2023 is an act of individual action that does not affect the rights of the plaintiff.

"The plaintiff's arguments that although the decree was not adopted directly in relation to Petro Poroshenko, but it concerns his rights and freedoms, as well as the statutory guarantees of the activity of people's deputies of Ukraine, are groundless," the court ruling says.

The court also emphasized that the incident with Poroshenko's travel ban in December 2023 is not the subject of this dispute. The resolution of the Grand Chamber entered into force on October 3 and is not subject to appeal.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Boxing legend Lennox Lewis commented on the incident in the fight between Usyk and DuBois

Legendary boxer Lennox Lewis expressed his opinion about the scandal,...

The youth hockey team of Ukraine won the World Championship

The youth hockey team of Ukraine achieved a historic success, winning...

In Ukraine, the State Standard of Primary Education will be revised

The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (MES) plans to introduce changes...

"Ukrzaliznytsia" lost 140 million due to the actions of the deputy

An incumbent People's Deputy of Ukraine found himself at the center of a corruption scandal,...

The enemy is trying to break through the border in Sumy Oblast

Russian sabotage and intelligence groups (DRG) are actively trying to penetrate the territory of...

Ukrainians with electric heating will pay for electricity under new conditions

The Government of Ukraine adopted new rules for payment of electricity for consumers,...

The media learned about the fortune of the wife of the head of the KMVA Timur Tkachenko

The appointment of Timur Tkachenko as the head of the Kyiv City Military Administration (KMVA)...

Ukraine is ready for peace initiatives, but only on its own terms, - Serhiy Kyslytsia

The Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the UN, Serhiy Kyslytsia, stated that...