Poroshenko lost the trial against Zelenskyi

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the ex-president and People's Deputy from "European Solidarity" Petro Poroshenko against the current President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyi.

Since the end of last year, Poroshenko has been trying to cancel Presidential Decree No. 27 of January 23, 2023 "On some issues regarding crossing the state border of Ukraine under martial law." This document implemented the decision of the National Security and Defense Council, according to which the Cabinet of Ministers had to make changes to the rules for crossing the state border for civil servants, people's deputies, judges and prosecutors, allowing travel only on business trips.

Poroshenko believes that the decree violated his constitutional right to freely leave the territory of Ukraine. However, on December 1, 2023, the border guards did not allow him to go on a business trip to Poland and the USA to participate in the Summit of the International Democratic Union. The spokesman of the State Border Service of Ukraine (SPSU) Andrii Demchenko said that the ban on leaving was connected with the fact that the Verkhovna Rada canceled the trip of the People's Deputy.

In his lawsuit, Poroshenko noted that the border guards were guided by new changes that came into effect after the controversial presidential decree was issued.

The Supreme Court initially returned Poroshenko's lawsuit because he missed the deadline for challenging Zelenskyi's decree. According to the law, the period for appeal is six months from the moment of adoption of the document, which expired on July 25, 2023.

Disagreeing with this decision, Poroshenko appealed it in the Great Chamber of the Supreme Court. However, the court concluded that the decree of January 23, 2023 is an act of individual action that does not affect the rights of the plaintiff.

"The plaintiff's arguments that although the decree was not adopted directly in relation to Petro Poroshenko, but it concerns his rights and freedoms, as well as the statutory guarantees of the activity of people's deputies of Ukraine, are groundless," the court ruling says.

The court also emphasized that the incident with Poroshenko's travel ban in December 2023 is not the subject of this dispute. The resolution of the Grand Chamber entered into force on October 3 and is not subject to appeal.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Why cannot be drunk with coffee: a list of dangerous combinations

A morning cup of coffee is a habit without which many ...

Living minimum in Ukraine: one jacket for three years

In Ukraine, the official standards of the subsistence minimum remain far from ...

How much water you need to drink daily: a new study refutes a popular myth

The recommendation to drink two liters of water daily knows every day. Its...

Scientists have explored the impact of alcohol on decision -making in men and women

Alcohol can have a different effect on the behavior of men and women, ...

7 foods that help to keep your youth and skin elasticity - without cosmetic interventions

The diet has a significant effect on the skin. Researchers of Edinburgh ...

NAPC found a violation in the declaration of the employee of the Tax Code from Belaya Tserkov

The National Anti -Corruption Agency (NAPC) has found a violation ...

In Zaporozhye, a law enforcement officer who killed a colleague and tried to betray it for suicide will be tried

The State Bureau of Investigation has completed a pre -trial investigation of a law enforcement agencies ...

The Rivne TCC serviceman was injured as a result of conflict with the locals

In the Rivne region there was an incident with the participation of territorial servicemen ...