Poroshenko lost the trial against Zelenskyi

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the ex-president and People's Deputy from "European Solidarity" Petro Poroshenko against the current President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyi.

Since the end of last year, Poroshenko has been trying to cancel Presidential Decree No. 27 of January 23, 2023 "On some issues regarding crossing the state border of Ukraine under martial law." This document implemented the decision of the National Security and Defense Council, according to which the Cabinet of Ministers had to make changes to the rules for crossing the state border for civil servants, people's deputies, judges and prosecutors, allowing travel only on business trips.

Poroshenko believes that the decree violated his constitutional right to freely leave the territory of Ukraine. However, on December 1, 2023, the border guards did not allow him to go on a business trip to Poland and the USA to participate in the Summit of the International Democratic Union. The spokesman of the State Border Service of Ukraine (SPSU) Andrii Demchenko said that the ban on leaving was connected with the fact that the Verkhovna Rada canceled the trip of the People's Deputy.

In his lawsuit, Poroshenko noted that the border guards were guided by new changes that came into effect after the controversial presidential decree was issued.

The Supreme Court initially returned Poroshenko's lawsuit because he missed the deadline for challenging Zelenskyi's decree. According to the law, the period for appeal is six months from the moment of adoption of the document, which expired on July 25, 2023.

Disagreeing with this decision, Poroshenko appealed it in the Great Chamber of the Supreme Court. However, the court concluded that the decree of January 23, 2023 is an act of individual action that does not affect the rights of the plaintiff.

"The plaintiff's arguments that although the decree was not adopted directly in relation to Petro Poroshenko, but it concerns his rights and freedoms, as well as the statutory guarantees of the activity of people's deputies of Ukraine, are groundless," the court ruling says.

The court also emphasized that the incident with Poroshenko's travel ban in December 2023 is not the subject of this dispute. The resolution of the Grand Chamber entered into force on October 3 and is not subject to appeal.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Experts explained when to drink tea so as not to harm your health

Tea can significantly affect the absorption of iron from food,...

Immunity in winter: what really helps to avoid colds, doctors will tell you

In recent years, winter wellness trends have caused a real stir among...

The corruption vertical of the Ministry of Internal Affairs: the role of the minister and his team

Minister of Internal Affairs Ihor Klymenko, who began his career in...

The wife of a former forester became the owner of a Porsche and new real estate

Former head of the Polissya Forestry Office of the State Enterprise "Forests of Ukraine" Serhiy...

Kharkiv Region Prosecutor Uses Relative's Apartment Free of Charge

Prosecutor of the Kharkiv region Amil Azad oglu Omarov with his family...

Who is entitled to payments if a soldier is captured?

Amid the war, many families are looking for information about the order...

VAKS took into custody an accomplice of People's Deputy Hanna Skorokhod for extorting $250,000

The Supreme Anti-Corruption Court has chosen a preventive measure for the accomplice of the People's Deputy...

Ukraine is among the top five world leaders in state bitcoin reserves

Ukraine has strengthened its position in the global crypto economy, taking fourth place...