The court left Tishchenko's property for millions

The Supreme Anti -Corruption Court left unchanged seizure of the property of the People's Deputy from the "servant of the people" Mykola Tyshchenko. It is more than $ 300,000, 150 thousand euros and an elite clock Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Off Shore.

This decision was made in the framework of the NABU investigation concerning the possible illegal enrichment of the People's Deputy and the lie in the Declaration for 2022. Investigators believe that Tishchenko did not declare assets for an amount that significantly exceeds his legal income - over UAH 30 million.

That was arrested

The property was seized during searches in the dwellings of Tishchenko himself and his ex -wife. In addition to the arrested funds, searches found another $ 320 thousand and more than 240 thousand euros, which came to NABU from the parallel DBR proceedings.

Protection of the politician tried to challenge the arrest, insisting that:

  • Tishchenko was not reported;

  • searches were allegedly conducted without proper permits;

  • money and watch - declared property;

  • The arrest is based only on the investigator's assumptions.

In addition, the lawyers of the People's Deputy claimed that the seized property of the DBR had never arrested, and therefore NABU had no right to use it in its proceedings.

Why did the court leave everything under arrest

The NABU representative denied all the arguments of the defense party. He noted that:

  • searches were conducted on the basis of the resolution of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv;

  • Tishchenko received a proper notice of the meeting, but did not appear;

  • The property has the status of physical evidence, and its value does not correspond to the declared income of the People's Deputy.

The court fully supported the position of the investigation. The decision states that Tishchenko's lifestyle, including regular trips abroad and expensive purchases, raises doubts about the legality of the origin.

Criminal proceedings concerns Art. 366-2 (declaration of false information) and Art. 368-5 (illegal enrichment) of the Criminal Code. This is not the first time that Tishchenko's name in corruption scandals. This time, according to documents, anti -corruption authorities are set to finish the case.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

How do fish live in the exclusion zone: Research results of the Chernobyl Reserve

Scientists conducted ichthyological studies in the reservoirs of the Chernobyl radiation-ecological biosphere ...

Why does the weight not go: the main reasons and advice from nutritionists

Even with a stable calorie deficiency, the body may not lose ...

Nadia Dorofeyev supported Alexander Usik on Vembib before historical battle

Ukrainian singer Nadia Dorofeeva came to London to support ...

NABU exposed the SBU employee on a bribe: demanded $ 300,000 for the destruction of evidence

National Anti -Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and Specialized Anti -Corruption Prosecutor's Office ...

The head of the Forests of Ukraine is suspected of negligence

The executive director of the State Enterprise "Forests of Ukraine" Igor Ltsiuri was announced ...

The Ternopil region was extracted by a man who was transporting evidence abroad under the guise of drivers

From Poland to Ukraine, a resident of Buchach Ternopil was extracted ...

Ukrainians can get up to UAH 1 million to open a private garden

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has expanded the possibilities of the State Grant Program "Own ...