The court left Tishchenko's property for millions

The Supreme Anti -Corruption Court left unchanged seizure of the property of the People's Deputy from the "servant of the people" Mykola Tyshchenko. It is more than $ 300,000, 150 thousand euros and an elite clock Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Off Shore.

This decision was made in the framework of the NABU investigation concerning the possible illegal enrichment of the People's Deputy and the lie in the Declaration for 2022. Investigators believe that Tishchenko did not declare assets for an amount that significantly exceeds his legal income - over UAH 30 million.

That was arrested

The property was seized during searches in the dwellings of Tishchenko himself and his ex -wife. In addition to the arrested funds, searches found another $ 320 thousand and more than 240 thousand euros, which came to NABU from the parallel DBR proceedings.

Protection of the politician tried to challenge the arrest, insisting that:

  • Tishchenko was not reported;

  • searches were allegedly conducted without proper permits;

  • money and watch - declared property;

  • The arrest is based only on the investigator's assumptions.

In addition, the lawyers of the People's Deputy claimed that the seized property of the DBR had never arrested, and therefore NABU had no right to use it in its proceedings.

Why did the court leave everything under arrest

The NABU representative denied all the arguments of the defense party. He noted that:

  • searches were conducted on the basis of the resolution of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv;

  • Tishchenko received a proper notice of the meeting, but did not appear;

  • The property has the status of physical evidence, and its value does not correspond to the declared income of the People's Deputy.

The court fully supported the position of the investigation. The decision states that Tishchenko's lifestyle, including regular trips abroad and expensive purchases, raises doubts about the legality of the origin.

Criminal proceedings concerns Art. 366-2 (declaration of false information) and Art. 368-5 (illegal enrichment) of the Criminal Code. This is not the first time that Tishchenko's name in corruption scandals. This time, according to documents, anti -corruption authorities are set to finish the case.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Bacteria and insomnia: why the state of the gut and mouth affects rest

When we fall asleep, the body's work doesn't stop. Together...

From investments to lawsuits: what is behind the debts of Chernihiv CHP

During the war, when every budget hryvnia counts...

The government is launching a mass certification of customs officers: about 10 thousand employees will be tested

The Cabinet of Ministers approved a new procedure for certifying customs officials...

Former heads of the Kyivmisksvitla department declared suspicious due to overpayment of UAH 14.5 million for streetlights

In Kyiv, the former head of the department of the Kyivmisksvitlo municipal enterprise was informed about...

Magnesium deficiency: how it manifests itself and who it most often affects

Magnesium deficiency is a common but often unnoticed condition that...

Stolichny Market: How State-Owned Plots Ended Up in Private Hands

Anti-corruption authorities are investigating the land deal surrounding the wholesale market...

SAPO demands confiscation of property of MIA official Popovych worth over UAH 8 million

The Specialized Anti -Corruption Prosecutor's Office filed a lawsuit against the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court ...