Turchynov acknowledged that most of the military in Crimea surrendered without a fight

Former acting President Oleksandr Turchynov stated that in 2014, an order for armed resistance to the occupation of Crimea was issued, but he was not enforced because of the critical state of the army, mass betrayal of personnel and lack of support from international partners. The politician said this in response to the comment of the Navy Commander Alexei Shepapa.

“I signed the order for the use of weapons on March 18. But even after re -disposal, no serviceman opened fire, ”Turchynov said.

According to the politician, by the time of the invasion of the Russian Federation, the Ukrainian army was actually destroyed: out of 36 anti -aircraft complexes, only 10 were ammunition, and out of 111 airfields - 28 remained. Yanukovych, says Turchinov, systematically eliminated combat units in strategically important regions, in particular.

Turchynov noted that most of the personnel in the Crimea refused to obey orders and moved to the side of the enemy. In particular, out of 14 thousand military, the majority were local contractors and seizures. 90%were betrayed from the SBU in Crimea, 96%of the State Security Service, 99%from the police.

At the time of aggression, Turchynov says, Russian troops blocked the Crimea with the sea and from the air. Land ships, assault aviation and flotillas from all directions were thrown. At the same time, up to 200,000 military in the north and east of Ukraine.

"We had only a few erected battalions-tactical groups-up to 5,000 soldiers, poorly armed and non-prepared," Turchinov said.

The politician stressed that he advocated the introduction of martial law, but did not receive support in the NSDC. The leaders of the parliamentary majority refused for the fear of disrupting the election.

“Ukraine needed a legitimate power that the world recognized. It was a key argument against the introduction of martial law, ”he explained.

Turchynov also noted that Ukraine remained without the support of partners. Even within the framework of the Budapest Memorandum, no country provided Ukraine with either weapons or equipment. Moreover, supplies of bulletproof vests and even helmets were blocked.

“We were not given any nail. The embargo lasted until the end of 2017, ”he emphasized.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Archaeologists found Cossack artifacts near Nekhvoroshchansky Monastery

Near the Nekhvoroshchansky Monastery, which stood on the lands of the former Oryol...

NACP revealed violations in the declaration of former Justice Ministry official Legostayev amounting to over 2 million hryvnias

In the declaration of the former head of the Southeastern Interregional Department of the Ministry of Justice...

In Vinnytsia region, officials were exposed in schemes involving land and budget funds

Prosecutor General of Ukraine Ruslan Kravchenko reported that the prosecutor's office...

Singer Loboda in Batumi reprimanded fans for using Russian and outraged the Internet

Singer Svetlana Loboda, who left Ukraine after the full-scale Russian invasion...

Instead of fighting crime, law enforcement agencies are "covering up" OnlyFans and fake call centers

While many countries around the world are legalizing and taxing the content industry...

Combining psychiatry and immunology helps predict suicide risk

A groundbreaking study published in the journal BMC Psychiatry showed:...

IDPs will be able to receive housing rental compensation from the state

Internally displaced persons (IDPs) will soon be able to apply for full...

Record global warming: heat waves have destroyed ocean ecosystems

The world's oceans experienced the most extreme and longest...