Innovation about "measures of influence" (restriction of the right to drive vehicles, seizure of accounts and valuables) is "compulsion of a person by the state." The Council's lawyers write that it is impossible to agree with this innovation, because they want to bring people who evade mobilization to this kind of responsibility outside the framework of the mechanisms available in the legislation. These "measures of influence" are not subject to civil, administrative, or criminal liability. The adoption of such measures, even by a court decision, is objectionable, since the state already has mechanisms for bringing law violators to justice.
The requirement to register the electronic account of a conscript, conscript , reservist is incomplete. It is not clear which system will provide such services.
The time of attendance at the TCC is not sufficiently clearly defined. It is not clear from which date to count 60 days for appearing before the TCC.
It is not said how local authorities should ensure the arrival of conscripts to the TCC. GNEU also notes that in accordance with the law on the protection of personal data, the Constitution and international norms, a person may not disclose his personal data at the request of the authorities.
The question remains as to how the presence of women in the military register will be checked, since only some of them have military duty.
The draft law ambiguously interprets the right of the TCC to establish an obligation for a citizen , except to appear or to clarify the registration data.
HLEU criticizes the new rule that deferment will be granted only to persons of the first degree of kinship with the person in need of care, since in practice there may be other family members dependent on the conscript who are not necessarily first-order relatives. And in the event of a breadwinner being drafted, people who need care will remain without help.
GNEU criticizes the removal from the law of the norm that a conscript can take care of the parents of his wife (husband), grandparents, half-brothers and sisters.
There are no armor criteria for security forces, which "will lead to unpredictability of changes and legal relations in this area."
Graduate students-contract workers should retain the right to postponement, the GNEU believes, because the law provides for equal rights to education for both budget workers and contract workers.
There is no legal regulation of communication with conscripts who are abroad. It is not clear which body abroad will accept the "requirements" of the TCC.
HLEU criticizes the innovation that the police should deliver conscripts to the TCC, because there is no fact that a citizen has committed a violation, and without a court decision about the person's guilt, no one can be considered guilty of a violation.
