Judge Svitlana Smyk unblocked 2.6 billion hryvnias of the Russian casino Pin-Up for a bribe

According to our source in law enforcement, for unblocking 2.6 billion hryvnias of the Russian casino Pin-Up, judge of the Pechersk court Svitlana Smyk received a bribe of 13 million hryvnias and “retired.”

Recall that 2.6 billion hryvnias of the online casino Pin-Up, whose real owners are Russians , were confiscated by ARMA and sent to finance the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

But in the spring of 2024, Pechersk Court judge Svitlana Smyk, by her decision, lifted the arrest of 2.6 billion hryvnias, effectively returning them to the Russians.

This decision of the Pechersk court caused a wide public outcry, and the then head of ARMA, Olena Duma, publicly questioned the integrity of judge Svitlana Smyk :

“Judge of the Pechersk court Svitlana Smyk not only held a hearing, but also managed to immediately issue a court ruling and a resolution on the cancellation of the arrest of 2.6 billion hryvnias of Pin-Up. This never happens every day. Here, you need to think.

 The National Agency has already allocated these funds to the purchase of Military Bonds, and therefore to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

 "The court's cynical position. I am convinced that this is not happening for no reason." 

In addition to the decision to return 2.6 billion hryvnias to Russians, the judge of the Pechersk court is known for a number of other questionable decisions that were likely accompanied by a corruption component.

Thus, previously, Judge Svitlana Smyk was a defendant in a case about delaying and closing cases regarding drunk driving .

Between 2019 and 2021, Judge Svitlana Smyk reviewed more than three hundred cases of drunk drivers, but in 76% of cases, she delayed the consideration and closed the proceedings due to the expiration of the deadlines.

Despite significant public outcry, Judge Svitlana Smyk received only a "reprimand" for the mass "excuse of drunk drivers."

No. 757/28800/20-p in 2020 , which is why she does not stop even from making decisions in favor of the Russians during a full-scale invasion.

We ask that this material be considered an official journalistic request to the State Bureau of Investigation and NABU, in order to verify the facts set forth in this article.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

popular

Share this post:

More like this
HERE

Doctors warn: constant dry mouth may indicate serious diseases

The problem of dry mouth, or xerostomia, often occurs due to...

The Supreme Court of Justice confirmed the illegality of assets worth UAH 3.3 million belonging to an official of the Ministry of Justice

The Appeals Chamber of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court left the decision unchanged...

Singer Mogilevskaya revealed details of her personal life and meeting her new lover

Ukrainian singer Natalia Mogilevska frankly shared details of her personal life...

Kharkiv court refuses to enter data into ERDR in several cases concerning contractors and officials

In Kharkiv, a number of applicants report that attempts to...

Head of the State Financial Monitoring Service Pronin appears in several NABU proceedings

The head of the State Financial Monitoring Service, Philip Pronin, appears in...

Father and brother of Deputy Prosecutor General Maria Vdovichenko suspected of treason and collaboration

The Prosecutor General's Office has opened criminal proceedings against the father and...

Poll: Most citizens see Yermak's possible involvement in "Mindichgate"

Most Ukrainian citizens believe that the head of the President's Office, Andriy...

Former People's Deputy Arkady Kornatskyi sentenced to 3.5 years for illegal compensation for housing

The Supreme Anti-Corruption Court sentenced a former People's Deputy of the 8th convocation...