The court in Rivne region issued a sentence in the resonant case of Yevgeny Pavlyshyn, son of Pavel Pavlyshyn - the first deputy mayor of Varash and former director of Rivne NPP. The official of the official was found guilty of committing a crime, but the punishment imposed was conditional, which broke the public.
Thus, according to the text of the verdict of the Volodymyretsky District Court, Pavlyshyn Jr. was found guilty of the death of an elderly woman, which he beat on his own turbag in the summer of 2022.
“Pavlyshyn Eugene Pavlovich should be found guilty of the crime under Part 1 of Article 122 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and to impose a sentence in the form of imprisonment for a term of 2 (two) years. On the basis of Art. 75 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to be released from serving a sentence with a test, having set a probationary period of 2 years ... ”, - the court's decision reads.
The court also partially satisfied the civil claim of relatives of the dead woman, awarding only 50,000 UAH of compensation for moral harm to everyone. In addition, 102 920 UAH of court costs for examinations was collected from Pavlyshyn.
A fair Varash telegram, which systematically covers the case, publishes shocking data on how Pavlyshyn's "withdrawal" was criminally responsible.
“It's not just another episode of corruption. It is a demonstration of the absolute impunity of the Pavlyshin family, where money, relationships and fear have become the basis for avoiding responsibility even for the most serious crimes. "
According to the post, Yevgeny Pavlyshyn was marked by aggressive behavior from his youth - pouring cars of activists with acid, organized arson of cars, provoked constant conflicts. The culmination was the cruel beating of a woman who died in the hospital, and not having come to her senses.
The channel's message provides details of gross falsification of the case.
“Three exhumation in a row to reach the“ correct ”conclusions of the examination.
It spent more than $ 400,000 to bribe experts, prosecutors and judges.
However, even during one of the exhumations, the official forensic expert, who was present during the autopsy, confirmed that there were four hematomas on the body of the dead, not one, as they wrote in counterfeit documents, ”the just Varash notes.
The regional channel claims that the director of the hospital, the godfather of the suspect, deliberately manipulated medical records to present the death of a woman as an accident.
Also reported active concealment of witnesses, delaying the investigation, the disappearance of evidence, the pressure on anyone who tried to achieve the truth, by the police, the prosecutor's office and even the SBU.
Activists prepare public appeals on this occasion to the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine, the State Bureau of Investigation, Ukrainian and International Investigators, Anti-Corruption NGOs.
"Together we will force the system to answer!" - says the statement of "Just Varash".
We will remind, in the summer of 2022 on the territory of the recreation center "Kholodok" (Rudka village of Varas district of Rivne region) Yevgeny Pavlyshyn - the son of the former head of Rivne NPP Pavel Pavlyshyn - beat two women. The victims of the 64-year-old mother and her daughter were rented on the base owned by Pavlyshyn, a lodge. Subsequently, an older woman died in hospital from her injuries.
The criminal case against Pavlyshyn Jr. was initially qualified as "premeditated murder." But later - in two years of the investigation - the National Police by suddenly changed the qualification of the proceedings. And to court it was directed as a matter for "hooliganism".
So, the initial qualification of the Pavlyshyn case looked like this: Part 1 of Art. 125 (intentional light bodily harm), Part 2 of Art. 121 (deliberate grievous bodily harm), Part 1 of Art. 115 (premeditated murder) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
And later, rewriting the accusations in favor of the accused, law enforcement officers accused Pavlyshyn only "intentional causing physical injuries, which are not dangerous to life and did not entail the consequences provided for in Article 121 of the Criminal Code - Art. 122 h. 1 ». Although the injured woman died in the hospital without come to consciousness.
